Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN),
Mallam Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, has advocated the need for Africa to develop own
strategy to stimulate growth of economies in the continent.
Sanusi stated this in a paper titled: “Neither
the Washington nor Beijing Consensus: Developmental Models to fit African
Realities and Cultures,” presented at the Eirenicon Africa Public Lecture
Series (EAPLS) held at The Royal School of Medicine, London. A copy of the
speech delivered on March 27, 2012, was posted on the apex bank’s website
Tuesday.
Sanusi, insisted that Africa, with its huge natural resources, regional market size and human resources ought not to be a marginal player in the global economy.
According to the regulator, neither the
Washington Consensus nor the Beijing Consensus could bring about the desired
change in the continent.
“The implications of the structure of African economies need to be critically appraised in order to identify an appropriate African Consensus - for its development model.
“The implications of the structure of African economies need to be critically appraised in order to identify an appropriate African Consensus - for its development model.
“In this regard, a development strategy for the
continent would include a framework that embrace competitive regional and
international trade, development of critical infrastructural, harnessing of the
potential of the huge natural resource endowment, including abundant labour
force and large domestic market,” the central bank chief said.
The CBN governor also argued that trade
liberalisation that was recommended by the Washington Consensus further
compounded Africa’s problems, saying that African countries had been unable to
develop efficient and low-cost industries that could compete favourably in the
global market.
He added: “Thus, while many countries outside Africa have been able to liberalise foreign trade to increase their share of global trade, Africa had witnessed declining terms of trade with adverse effects on export revenue and real exchange rate.
He added: “Thus, while many countries outside Africa have been able to liberalise foreign trade to increase their share of global trade, Africa had witnessed declining terms of trade with adverse effects on export revenue and real exchange rate.
“Although, the Washington Consensus could be said
to have improved macroeconomic stability in Sub-Sahara Africa (SSA), it had not
facilitated the solution to development in Africa and developing countries in
general.
“This observation was supported by Woo (2004),
who elucidated that although Indonesia, Korea and Thailand implemented the
Washington Consensus type of policies to counter the Asian financial crisis,
they suffered deeper output losses for a longer period than Malaysia, which
adopted capital controls instead.”
The continent’s economic growth, according to
him, had been grossly inhibited by a global trade system inimical to the full
exploitation of its comparative advantage. Furthermore, he pointed out that a
limited market access for low-cost textiles, cotton, and agricultural products
and competition from heavily subsidised exports from industrialised economies
had also prevented growth in Africa.
“Thus, unable to produce capital intensive goods,
African countries have been reduced to net importers of finished products.
Hence, for African economies to achieve their growth potentials, they should be
able to utilise their export earnings to broaden their production base and
productivity,” he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment